Applicability and usage of dose mapping/accumulation in radiotherapy.

Dose mapping/accumulation (DMA) is a topic in radiotherapy (RT) for years, but has not yet found its widespread way into clinical RT routine. During the ESTRO Physics workshop 2021 on “commissioning and quality assurance of deformable image registration (DIR) for current and future RT applications”, we built a working group on DMA from which we present the results of our discussions in this article. Our aim in this manuscript is to shed light on the current situation of DMA in RT and to highlight the issues that hinder consciously integrating it into clinical RT routine. As a first outcome of our discussions, we present a scheme where representative RT use cases are positioned, considering expected anatomical variations and the impact of dose mapping uncertainties on patient safety, which we have named the DMA landscape (DMAL). This tool is useful for future reference when DMA applications get closer to clinical day-to-day use. Secondly, we discussed current challenges, lightly touching on first-order effects (related to the impact of DIR uncertainties in dose mapping), and focusing in detail on second-order effects often dismissed in the current literature (as resampling and interpolation, quality assurance considerations, and radiobiological issues). Finally, we developed recommendations, and guidelines for vendors and users. Our main point include: Strive for context-driven DIR (by considering their impact on clinical decisions/judgements) rather than perfect DIR; be conscious of the limitations of the implemented DIR algorithm; and consider when dose mapping (with properly quantified uncertainties) is a better alternative than no mapping.

Lena Nenoff, Florian Amstutz, Martina Murr, Ben Archibald-Heeren, Marco Fusella, Mohammad Hussein, Wolfgang Lechner, Ye Zhang, Greg Sharp and Eliana Vasquez Osorio. | Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2023. | https://doi.org/10.1088/13616560/ad0d8a.

Martina Murr, Uffe Bernchou, Edyta Bubula-Rehm, Mark Ruschin, Parisa Sadeghi, Peter Voet, Jeff D Winter, Jinzhong Yang, Eyesha Younus, Cornel Zachiu, Yao Zhao, Hualiang Zhong, Daniela Thorwarth. | A multi-institutional comparison of retrospec- tive deformable dose accumulation for online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided ra- diotherapy. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2024;0. | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100588.

Martina Murr, Daniel Wegener, Simon B¨ oke, Cihan Gani, David M¨ onnich, Maximil- ian Niyazi, Moritz Schneider, Daniel Zips, Arndt-Christian M ¨ uller, Daniela Thorwarth. | Comparison of online adaptive and non-adaptive magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer using dose accumulation. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2024;32. | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100662

Dominika Skwierawska, Sebastian Bickelhaupt, Maximilian Bachl, Rolf Janka, Martina Murr, Felix Gloger, Tristan A Kuder, Moritz Zaiss, Dominique Hadler, Michael Uder, Frederik B Laun. | Relevance of Prostatic Fluid on the Apparent Diffusion Coeffi- cient: An Inversion Recovery Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Investigation Invest Radiol. 60(6):p 357-368, June 2025.| https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000001139